Are Social Deprivation and Low Traditional Health Literacy Associated With Higher PROMIS CAT Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) may be used to assess an individual patient's perspective of their physical, mental, and social health through either standard or computer adaptive testing (CAT) patient questionnaires. These questionnaires are used across disciplines; however, they have seen considerable application in orthopaedic surgery. Patient characteristics associated with PROMIS CAT completion have not been examined within the context of social determinants of health, such as social deprivation or health literacy, nor has patient understanding of the content of PROMIS CAT been assessed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What patient demographics, including social deprivation, are associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (2) Is health literacy level associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (3) Do patients with lower health literacy have a higher odds of completing PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the content? METHODS: Between June 2022 and August 2022, a cross-sectional study was performed via a paper survey administered to patients at a single, urban, quaternary academic medical center in orthopaedic subspecialty clinics of foot and ankle, trauma, and hand/upper extremity surgeons. We considered all English-speaking patients aged 18 or older, including those with limited reading and/or writing abilities, as eligible provided they received an iPad in clinic to complete the PROMIS CAT questionnaire as part of their routine standard clinical care or they completed the questionnaire via a patient portal before the visit. In all, 946 patients were considered eligible during the study period and a convenience sample of 36% (339 of 946) of patients was approached for inclusion due to clinic time constraints. Fifteen percent (52 of 339) declined to participate, leaving 85% (287 of 339) of patients for analysis here. Median (range) age of study participants was 49 years (35 to 64). Fifty-eight percent (167 of 287) of study participants self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American and 26% (75 of 287) as non-Hispanic White. Even proportions were observed across education levels (high school graduate or less, 29% [82 of 287]; some college, 25% [73 of 287]; college graduate, 25% [71 of 287]; advanced degree, 20% [58 of 287]). Eighteen percent (52 of 287) of patients reported an annual income bracket of USD 0 to 13,000, and 17% (48 of 287) reported more than USD 120,000. Forty-six percent (132 of 287) of patients worked full-time, 21% (59 of 287) were retired, and 23% (66 of 287) were unemployed or on disability. The primary outcome of interest was self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion grouped as: fully completed, partially completed, or no part completed. Overall, self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion proportions were: 80% (229 of 287) full completion, 13% (37 of 287) partial completion, and 7% (21 of 287) no part completed. We collected the National Area Deprivation Index (ADI) score and the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF) as part of the study survey to associate with level of completion. Additionally, patient understanding of PROMIS CAT was assessed through Likert-scaled responses to a study survey question that directly asked whether the patient understood all of the questions on the PROMIS CAT questionnaire. Responses to this question may have been limited by social desirability bias, and hence may overestimate how many individuals genuinely understood the questionnaire content. However, the benefit of this approach was it efficiently allowed us to estimate the ceiling effect of patient comprehension of PROMIS CAT and likely had a high degree of specificity for detecting lack of comprehension. RESULTS: ADI score adjusted for age was not associated with PROMIS CAT completion (partial completion OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.98 to 1.01]; p = 0.72, no part completed OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.03]; p = 0.45). Patients with lower health literacy scores, however, were more likely to not complete any part of their assigned questionnaires than patients with higher scores (no part completed OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.97]; p = 0.02). Additionally, 74% (26 of 35) of patients who did not fully understand all of the PROMIS CAT questionnaire questions still fully completed them-hence, 11% (26 of 229) of all patients who fully completed PROMIS CAT did not fully understand the content. Among patients self-reporting full completion of PROMIS CAT with health literacy data (99% [227 of 229]), patients with inadequate/marginal health literacy were more likely than patients with adequate health literacy to not fully understand all of the questions (21% [14 of 67] versus 8% [12 of 160], OR 3.26 [95% CI 1.42 to 7.49]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Within an urban, socioeconomically diverse, orthopaedic patient population, health literacy was associated with PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion. Lower health literacy levels increased the likelihood of not completing any part of the assigned PROMIS CAT questionnaires. Additionally, patients completed PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the questions. This indicates that patient completion does not guarantee comprehension of the questions nor validity of their scores, even more so among patients with low health literacy. This is a substantive concern for fidelity of data gathered from PROMIS CAT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical implementation of the PROMIS CAT in orthopaedic populations will benefit from further research into health literacy to increase questionnaire completion and to ensure that patients understand the content of the questions they are answering, which will increase the internal validity of the outcome measure.

Wrist Salvage Procedures for the Treatment of Kienbock's Disease.

Kienbock's disease is a progressive condition characterized by lunate collapse, carpal instability, and eventually perilunate arthritis. Etiology is likely multifactorial, including vascular and anatomic or osseus causes. In cases of advanced disease, disabling pain, limited motion, and decreased grip strength may be present. The preferred treatment options for the nonreconstructable wrist are proximal row carpectomy (PRC), total wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). In the following chapter, we will discuss various surgical options for patients with advanced Kienbock's disease.

Articular Involvement with Retrograde Headless Compression Screw Fixation of the Metacarpal.

PURPOSE: Retrograde headless compression screw (RHCS) fixation for metacarpal fractures can lead to metacarpal head articular cartilage violation. This study aimed to quantify the articular surface loss after insertion of the RHCS and determine the functional range of motion (ROM) of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint at the point of contact between the proximal phalangeal (P1) base and the articular defect. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric hand specimens were analyzed for prefixation MCP joint ROM. After screw insertion, the ROM at which the dorsal portion of the P1 base begins to engage the screw tract defect, as well as the ROM at which the midsagittal portion of the P1 bisector engages the screw tract defect, was recorded. The distal axial articular surface of the metacarpal and the defects from screw insertion were measured using a digital image software program. RESULTS: Nine men and one woman (mean age, 69 years) were examined. The prefixation mean extension-flexion arc for all MCP joints ranged from 1° to 85°. After screw insertion, the mean MCP ROM at which the dorsal P1 articular surface first engaged the screw tract was 31°. Only 7 digits had screw tract engagement with the midsagittal bisector of the P1 base at a mean flexion angle of -18° (18° hyperextension). Mean articular surface violation increased from the index finger moving ulnarly, with an average of 3.9% involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Articular surface loss of the metacarpal head following RHCS insertion is negligible in a cadaveric model, with minimal engagement between the corresponding defect and the P1 base during functional ROM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Retrograde headless compression screw fixation of metacarpals inevitably damages the cartilage. However, the actual defect is small in proportion to the articular surface area and not engaged during functional activity. These biomechanical features may mitigate the surgeon's concern about joint destruction, while ensuring the benefits of early rehabilitation and minimal invasiveness of this technique.

The Effect of Image-Guided Corticosteroid Injections on Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

Background: Arthritis involving the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is common in the adult population. Initial treatment includes corticosteroid injections. Injections can be performed with image guidance to assist with placement; however, the clinical benefits are unclear. Methods: This retrospective study used Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases to identify patients from 2003 to 2014 with common International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for osteoarthritis of the CMC joint, Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for image and non-image-guided injections, and codes for surgical interventions. Length of time from injection until subsequent injection(s) and/or surgery was extrapolated for identified patients. Analysis of variance and binomial logistic regression were used to compare continuous variables and calculate odds ratios, respectively. Results: We identified 62 333 patients (68% women, 32% men), average age 59.7, with common ICD-9 diagnostic codes for CMC arthritis with respective injection CPT codes. The average number of days between the first and second injection for patients treated with non-guided injection was 237.3 versus 266.7 for image-guided injections. Of the 62333 patients, 8107 went on to operative treatment. Among operative patients, the average number of days to surgery following non-guided injection was 317.7 versus 333.7 days in the image-guided group. The average cost of performing non-image-guided injections was $203 less than using ultrasound. Conclusions: Image-guided thumb CMC injections do not result in significant increases in time between injections and do not lead to a meaningful delay to surgery. Future research needs to clarify the value of image-guided CMC injections in an increasingly economically conscientious health care environment.

Effect of Global Fracture Care Billing on Distal Radius Fractures.

Nonoperative distal radius fracture treatment without manipulation can be coded and billed in a global fee or itemized structure. Little is known regarding the association between these coding/billing structures and subsequent clinical care. The MarketScan Research Database (IBM, Armonk, New York) was retrospectively queried for patients with a distal radius fracture diagnosis code from 2003 to 2014. Patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code for surgical treatment or closed treatment with manipulation were excluded. The remaining nonoperatively treated patients were separated based on billing structure. Results were analyzed for provider initiating global fracture care, as well as the likelihood and frequency of follow-up visits related to the injury for each group. A total of 381,561 patients were identified based on inclusion criteria. Global fracture care billing was initiated for 177,153 (46%) patients, whereas itemized billing was performed for 204,408 (54%) patients. Orthopedic surgeons were the most likely provider (69%) to initiate global fracture care after diagnosis of distal radius fracture. Emergency physicians were the second most common specialty (6%). Patients for whom global fracture care was initiated were more likely to not receive any follow-up office visits compared with patients for whom itemized billing was performed (39.2% vs 25.4%). Additionally, patients with global billing had significantly fewer office visits during the 90-day global period (1.3 vs 2.3). This study demonstrates that patients billed via global fracture care have less frequent follow-up and fewer office visits during the 90-day global period than patients billed in itemized fashion. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5);e471-e475.].

Targeted Intervention to Increase Awareness of Opioid Overprescribing Significantly Reduces Narcotic Prescribing Within an Academic Orthopaedic Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a targeted intervention focused on increasing awareness of opioid overprescribing within an academic orthopaedic practice. DESIGN: Retrospective prescribing data was collected through an electronic chart review. A single time point, a departmental grand rounds titled "Opioid Use, Misuse, & Abuse in Orthopaedics," was conducted on February 8, 2017. Opioid prescribing data was analyzed for the year preceding and year immediately following this targeted intervention. Narcotics were standardized using milligram morphine equivalents (MME) for comparison, and patients were categorized as opioid naive or non-naive based on whether an opioid prescription was written within 90 days prior to surgery. A segmented time series regression model was utilized to determine statistical significance of the educational intervention. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures at our institution between January 2016 and March 2018. RESULTS: A total of 5882 patients underwent orthopaedic procedures at our institution during the study period. Of these, 2887 were in the year preceding and 2995 were in the year immediately following the targeted intervention to increase awareness of opioid overprescribing. The interve.ntion was associated with an acute decrease of 167 mean MME from 780 to 613 in opioid naive (p = 0.028) and 154 mean MME from 1,015 to 861 in opioid non-naive patients (p = 0.010). The intervention was also associated with a favorable change in the overall mean MME prescribing trend over time in both naive (p = 0.011) and non-naive (p = 0.064) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates decreased opioid prescribing within an academic orthopaedic department after a targeted intervention focused on raising the awareness of opioid overprescribing. Ongoing provider education and awareness are critical parts of any plan to continue curtail opioid overprescribing among surgeons.

Benchmarks of Duration and Magnitude of Opioid Consumption After Common Spinal Procedures: A Database Analysis of 47,823 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study performed in a nationwide insurance claims database. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine duration and magnitude of postoperative opioid prescriptions following common spinal procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative opioid prescription practices vary widely among providers and procedures and standards of care are not well-established. Previous work does not adequately quantify both duration and magnitude of opioid prescription. METHODS: Forty seven thousand eight hundred twenty three patients with record of any of four common spinal procedures in a nationwide insurance claims database were stratified by preoperative opioid use into three categories: "opioid naive," "sporadic user," or "chronic user," defined as 0, 1, or 2+ prescriptions filled in the 6 months preceding surgery. Those with record of subsequent surgery or readmission were excluded. Duration of opioid use was defined as the time between the index surgery and the last record of filling an opioid prescription. Magnitude of opioid use was defined as milligram morphine equivalents (MME) filled by 30 days post-op, converted to 5 mg oxycodone pills for interpretation. RESULTS: Opioid naive patients were less likely than chronic opioid users to fill any opioid prescription after surgery (63-68% naive vs. 91-95% chronic, P < 0.001), and when they did, their prescriptions were smaller in magnitude (76-91 pills naive vs. 127-152 pills chronic). One year after surgery, 15% to 18% of opioid naive and 50% to 64% of chronic opioid users continued filling prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Opioid naive patients use less postoperative opioids, and for a shorter period of time, than chronic users. This study serves as a normative benchmark for examining postoperative opioid use, which can assist providers in identifying patients with opioid dependence. Importantly, this work calls out the high risk of opioid exposure, as 15% to 18% of opioid naive patients continued filling opioid prescriptions 1 year after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Treatment Trends, Complications, and Effects of Comorbidities on Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. This study seeks to elucidate the impact age, fracture type, and patient comorbidities have on the current treatment of DRFs and risk of complications. We hypothesized that comorbidities rather than age would relate to the risk of complications in the treatment of DRFs. Methods: A retrospective review of data was performed for patients treated between 2007 and 2014 using Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Patients who sustained a DRF were separated into "closed" versus "open" treatment groups, and the association between patient demographics, treatment type, and comorbidities with complication rates was analyzed, along with the trend of treatment modalities throughout the study time interval. Results: In total, 155 353 DRFs were identified; closed treatment predominated in all age groups with the highest percentage of open treatment occurring in the 50- to 59-year age group. Between 2007 and 2014, there was an increase in the rate of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all age groups <90 with the largest increase (11%) occurring in the 70- to 79-year age group. Higher complication rates were observed in the open treatment group in all ages <90 years with a trend toward decreasing complication rates as age increased. Comorbidities were more strongly associated with the risk of developing complications than age. Conclusions: Closed treatment of DRFs remains the predominant treatment method among all age groups, but DRFs are increasingly being treated with ORIF. Emphasis on the patients' comorbidities rather than chronological age should be considered in the treatment decision-making process of elderly patients with DRFs.

The Opioid Epidemic: America's Epidemic.

The opioid epidemic in the United States has changed how medicine is practiced. There are tools and resources available to help the surgeon understand pain and provide appropriate pain management. Understanding pain, setting expectations, and diagnosing underlying medical dispositions that can lead to opioid addiction should become standard practice. Understanding available tools for communication, setting appropriate expectations, and preoperative planning for postoperative pain will provide better pain control. Through physical, mental, and medicinal modalities that include both opioids and nonopioid options, a more comprehensive treatment plan can provide better pain control while minimizing opioid side effects.

Triceps Tendon Repair.

Although triceps tendon ruptures can result from a traumatic incident, chronic overuse causing degenerative changes to the insertion and leading to a complete or partial rupture is more common. In our practice, we have found that anabolic steroid abuse by weightlifters is the most common predisposing factor. The initial diagnosis is often missed. A thorough clinical examination is imperative to avoid missing a partial or complete rupture. Ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging can confirm the diagnosis. Early diagnosis increases the chance of a direct repair. Operative treatment with direct repair is usually indicated for full-thickness or large partial-thickness tears. Direct repair may be possible for selected chronic tears. Triceps tendon repair is performed with the following steps.Step 1: The patient is placed in lateral decubitus.Step 2: The stump is debrided, and retraction of the tendon is evaluated.Step 3: Two crossed bone tunnels are drilled, and an anchor is placed centrally in the olecranon.Step 4: The elbow is extended, and the tendon is reduced and sutured centrally to the anchor and medially and laterally with use of the sutures from the bone tunnels.Step 5: The elbow is flexed to evaluate tension. If gapping occurs, the repair should be reinforced with extra sutures. Tension-free range of motion will guide postoperative rehabilitation.Step 6: A posterior splint is applied in the operating room with the elbow extended.Step 7: A dynamic brace is applied on the first postoperative day. Extension is free but flexion is blocked at the tension-free range; 30° of extra flexion is permitted every 2 weeks. Full flexion is always allowed after 6 weeks. Strengthening starts at 3 months. Pitfalls of the procedure include difficulty in differentiating between tendon and scar in subacute and chronic ruptures. It may not be possible to directly repair the triceps back to bone, and a graft may be needed to reconstruct the tendon. It is important to know where the ulnar nerve is and to release it if needed. It is important not to debride past the cortical surface of the olecranon if an anchor is used because, if this is done, fixation may be insufficient. The anchor should be predrilled as the cortical bone of the tip of the olecranon is very dense. Reruptures occur in up to 21% of cases. A functional range of motion is usually achieved with an average loss of extension of 10° and average flexion to 136°. At 1 year, one can expect a peak strength of approximately 80% of that on the uninjured side and endurance strength of 99%1.

Impact of Variation of Corticosteroid Dose, Injection Site, and Multiple Injections on Blood Glucose Measurement in Diabetic Patients.

PURPOSE: This study examined how corticosteroid dose, injection site location, and patient demographics affect blood glucose level after corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 70 patients with diabetes mellitus requiring upper- and/or lower-extremity corticosteroid injections. Patients measured fasting and postprandial blood glucose for 14 days after the injection. Blood glucose from days 1 through 7 was compared with the average of days 10 through 14, acting as control. Changes in blood glucose were compared by corticosteroid dose, injection location, patient demographics, and insulin use. RESULTS: Patients who underwent shoulder, wrist, or hand injections and patients who received multiple injections had no significant elevations in fasting or postprandial blood glucose, whereas those with knee injections had a significant increase in fasting blood glucose on postinjection days 1 and 2. Preinjection hemoglobin A1C had a significant effect on postinjection blood glucose whereas corticosteroid dose, body mass index, insulin use, and the number of injections had no significant effect on the elevation of blood glucose. There were no cases of diabetic ketoacidosis in any subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving corticosteroid injections in the upper extremity did not experience significant increases in blood glucose whereas those undergoing knee corticosteroid injections demonstrated elevated blood glucose levels. Because poorer glucose control was associated with greater elevations in blood glucose after injection, patients with higher hemoglobin A1C should be counseled to monitor postinjection glucose more closely. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Smartphone photography utilized to measure wrist range of motion.

The purpose was to determine if smartphone photography is a reliable tool in measuring wrist movement. Smartphones were used to take digital photos of both wrists in 32 normal participants (64 wrists) at extremes of wrist motion. The smartphone measurements were compared with clinical goniometry measurements. There was a very high correlation between the clinical goniometry and smartphone measurements, as the concordance coefficients were high for radial deviation, ulnar deviation, wrist extension and wrist flexion. The Pearson coefficients also demonstrated the high precision of the smartphone measurements. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated 29-31 of 32 smartphone measurements were within the 95% confidence interval of the clinical measurements for all positions of the wrists. There was high reliability between the photography taken by the volunteer and researcher, as well as high inter-observer reliability. Smartphone digital photography is a reliable and accurate tool for measuring wrist range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Anatomic considerations when performing the modified Henry approach for exposure of distal radius fractures.

BACKGROUND: Identify the proximity of anatomic structures during the modified Henry approach (MHA). METHODS: Distances between median nerve (MN), palmar cutaneous branch (PCB), radial artery (RA) and the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) were measured at the wrist crease (WC), 5 and 10 cm proximal in 16 fresh frozen cadavers. The FPL origin and innervation was measured. RESULTS: Most at risk was the MN proximally and the PCB distally while the RA was safe. Innervation occurred at the proximal third of the FPL's origin along the ulnar aspect. CONCLUSION: The MHA is safe when understanding the proximity of structures.

Lateral collateral ligament injuries of the elbow - chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI).

Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is the most common form of chronic elbow instability.PLRI usually occurs from a fall on the outstretched hand. On impact, the radial head and ulna rotate externally coupled with valgus displacement of the forearm. This leads to posterior displacement of the radial head relative to the capitellum, thus causing disruption of some or all of the lateral-sided stabilisers.PLRI is mainly a clinical diagnosis with a history of instability, clicking and lateral-sided pain, with a positive clinical examination including the pivot-shift test, push-up, chair and tabletop test.MRI can often help guide diagnosis but more commonly assists in surgical planning.Surgery is indicated in patients with persistent, symptomatic instability of the elbow causing pain or functional deficit. There are several surgical techniques to treat PLRI, often leading to good to excellent results.An open or arthroscopic technique has been successfully used in patients with symptomatic PLRI following one or more episodes of dislocation or subluxation. At the pre-operative examination under general anaesthesia, all of our patients had a positive pivot-shift test but not a frank dislocation. We prefer to perform a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) reconstruction with an allograft tendon.The outcomes after repair are good to excellent in the majority of patients. Results of acute repair are generally better compared with reconstruction. This is due to the fact that predictive factors for a poor outcome include the number of previous surgeries and the prevalence of degenerative changes at the elbow.Recurrent instability is not uncommon following repair or reconstruction and has been reported in up to 25% of patients after medium- to longer-term follow-up. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:461-468. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.160033.